To Conor:
I like how you really talked from the heart and said what you felt and thought. How you really showed that some times your thoughts are not all there and how you sometimes think and people may not understand but that is just how we think some times.
I agree with you we are stuck in our own minds. But I also feel that that I some times get confuse when we read the papers on what he is trying to get at and "What's it all mean?".
But I do think that with me saying that I know what you mean I can't not really be that stuck in my own mind because then I would know what you mean and know how you feel when you are confused.
Next time just do more into what you think and feel.
From reading what you wrote me realize that I am not the only one that thoughts come out crazy. That I think what I am thinking will sound crazy to other people but I never know until i say.
Thanks for making me think more.
To Shirley:
I think that it is nice to read someones blog that kind of feels the same way as the Mr. Banach. Imean so many people always disagree with what he says but not you.I feel differently to what you are saying yea I may be not that upset if my grandfather die and you may but I still know how it feels to be upset about something so I could still connect with you on teh thought of being upset about something.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
HW # 3
In this life I feel that we can never have a straight answer.
I feel that there are so many people and so many different life styles that we can never really say what is freedom or what is the right why to live life or what does it mean to be real or fake. While reading the Lecture By David Banach I never really felt that what he was saying was true nor did I feel that it was wrong. Banach talked a lot about how we only can say what we feel and never really know what other people are thinking or feeling. But if we are all human shouldn't we kind of know how other people feel? If I know I feel and really understand my feels shouldn't I be able to feel and understand what other people feel?
I mean as humans we connect to each other in some type of way. We may not know right away how they feel but as a person with feelings shouldn't we know how each other would feel. While reading the lecture I felt like he was saying things about how we never know what other people but yet he wrote a whole leature about what we think and how we never have freedom and do not connect with each other. So how can he say one thing but at the same time show something else. Does that mean that he is not being real. Life is just full of things we will never know. We are all different people and will never feel the same way as each other. So I think the bigger question is what is life with out unanswer questions.
I feel that there are so many people and so many different life styles that we can never really say what is freedom or what is the right why to live life or what does it mean to be real or fake. While reading the Lecture By David Banach I never really felt that what he was saying was true nor did I feel that it was wrong. Banach talked a lot about how we only can say what we feel and never really know what other people are thinking or feeling. But if we are all human shouldn't we kind of know how other people feel? If I know I feel and really understand my feels shouldn't I be able to feel and understand what other people feel?
I mean as humans we connect to each other in some type of way. We may not know right away how they feel but as a person with feelings shouldn't we know how each other would feel. While reading the lecture I felt like he was saying things about how we never know what other people but yet he wrote a whole leature about what we think and how we never have freedom and do not connect with each other. So how can he say one thing but at the same time show something else. Does that mean that he is not being real. Life is just full of things we will never know. We are all different people and will never feel the same way as each other. So I think the bigger question is what is life with out unanswer questions.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
What I think that Banach is saying when he says " absolute individuals" is that we are always by ourself. That no matter how much we talk to eachother or feel like we all go through the same thing but we are nothing a like. I feel in the middle, I feel that somethings we go through no one will never know how you feel but something that we go through. Like no one knows how you feel when you fail a test but we all know how it feels to lose someone. Like when someone people faila test they do not care but others start to cry.
1. What can the absolute freedom of absolute individuals means? I think that this mens that we can have the freedom to be us and do whatever we want to do. That people would be able to jugde you or say you crazy because they would be crazy or different just like you.
2. What is human flourishing or human happiness? I think that human flourishing and happinessis when can just be able to do what we want with no one saying anything about us. That we could all get along and no bad things would happen.
3. What ethics or code of action can emerge from a prosition that takes our individuality seriously? We can stop caring about what people say about us. We can just pay more attention to our selves and not on everyone else.
I think that the thing that was the most confusing part was the last line " It is to be an island of subjectivity in an otherwise objective world" I was trying to figure it out with my table but we still was not sure if that is what he was rying to get at.
I think that if would concern me because i love talking to people and like helping people with there problems.
1. What can the absolute freedom of absolute individuals means? I think that this mens that we can have the freedom to be us and do whatever we want to do. That people would be able to jugde you or say you crazy because they would be crazy or different just like you.
2. What is human flourishing or human happiness? I think that human flourishing and happinessis when can just be able to do what we want with no one saying anything about us. That we could all get along and no bad things would happen.
3. What ethics or code of action can emerge from a prosition that takes our individuality seriously? We can stop caring about what people say about us. We can just pay more attention to our selves and not on everyone else.
I think that the thing that was the most confusing part was the last line " It is to be an island of subjectivity in an otherwise objective world" I was trying to figure it out with my table but we still was not sure if that is what he was rying to get at.
I think that if would concern me because i love talking to people and like helping people with there problems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
